Russ Roberts's Federal Reserve Time Machine

EconTalk Extra
by Amy Willis
David Beckworth on Money, Mone... Jason Zweig on Finance and the...

This week's EconTalk episode was recorded before a live audience at the Cato Institute in conjunction with its Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives. Guest David Beckworth, a Cato adjunct scholar and professor at Western Kentucky University, offered his perspective on the causes of the Great Recession and the Federal Reserve's role in it.

1. What was the Federal Reserve's biggest mistake in its response to the 2008 financial crisis, according to Beckworth? What evidence does he provide for his claim?

2. How much control does the Federal Reserve really have over interest rates? In this 2013 Feature Article, Jeffrey Rogers Hummel calls such control a "myth." Compare Hummel's view to Beckworth's?

3. What are the advantages of a rule-based approach to monetary policy? Why is a rule-based policy so unlikely to be agreed upon, according to Roberts and Beckworth? If you were to choose one such rule, which would it be, and why?

4. Roberts presses throughout that as much as he wants to agree with Beckworth's analysis, it is an ex post narrative. Why does Roberts find this troublesome? What additional evidence does he suggest that might make Beckworth's analysis more convincing?

Comments and Sharing

TWITTER: Follow Russ Roberts @EconTalker

COMMENTS (1 to date)
jw writes:

2. A generally good article but I disagree with a lot of it. The premise that the Fed has "total" control is a straw man. He rightly says that the Fed has a significant short term effect, but the long term effect is not as described and the Fed has many more tools than just discount window interest rates.

The Fed can also drastically change reserve requirements, change "stress test" criteria, purchase assets (toxic and otherwise), and apparently make up other powers as they see fit (see paying interest on reserves).

However, just as we have a fiat money system (which is not necessarily a bad thing), we also have a fiat Fed. It is entirely based on faith (see Jim Grant's "PhD standard"). When this faith fails, then interest rates will disconnect from the Fed's carefully planned fantasy.

(An aside, velocity's current collapse seems to disprove the Mundell/Tobin theory.)

Comments for this podcast episode have been closed
Return to top