January 2, 2012
Sumner on Money and the Fed
December 26, 2011
Tabarrok on Innovation
December 19, 2011
Klein on Knowledge and Coordination
December 12, 2011
Munger on Profits, Entrepreneurship, and Storytelling
December 5, 2011
Cowen on the European Crisis
November 28, 2011
Simon Johnson on the Financial Crisis
November 21, 2011
Taubes on Fat, Sugar and Scientific Discovery
November 14, 2011
Baumeister on Gender Differences and Culture
November 7, 2011
Kaplan on the Inequality and the Top 1%
SHARE
Another problem with the BMI is that it only measures people's mass against one dimension. People are not beanstalks, though. They grow sideways and forwards and back. In other words, people have not only been getting taller, but they're getting more muscular. Since muscle mass is more dense than fat mass, it's not uncommon for people - particularly men - who are fit and in shape to blow the curve on the population's average BMI.
As an example, according to this: the average BMI on the Texas Rangers is 27.8, which makes them all well overweight.
Obviously, the Texas Rangers is not a perfect sample (but then, they also skew baseball players for height as much as weight - not everyone is a slugger). But it could be worse: see the Dodgers.
Now that I think of it, women are probably also blowing the BMI. Back in the day, there were a lot less women with the sort of fit, strong bodies that we have today.
Why comments are light gray on white? Could you make it more readable? Thank you very much!
G'day
Hi, Quine. You asked:
Many blogs use some kind of visual cue such as a color differential to distinguish comments from the author's writing. On EconTalk that's probably not necessary because our commenters have been very thoughtful! I've reset the comment color from gray to black.
Thanks for your help!
--Econlib Editor